施氮和种植模式对土壤结构及有机氮组分的影响

Effects of Nitrogen Application and Cropping System on Soil Structure and Nitrogen Fractions

  • 摘要:
    目的 分析施氮和不同种植模式(间作与轮作)土壤结构及土壤有机氮组分的差异,探究施氮与种植模式对土壤结构及氮组分的影响,为种植制度优化及农业可持续生产提供科学依据。
    方法 基于甘肃河西走廊灌漠土区2013年设立的长期定位试验,设置两个施氮量(0和300 kg hm−2)和三种种植模式(玉米/大豆间作;玉米-大豆轮作;大豆-玉米轮作),通过测定2024年轮作和间作条件下土壤水稳性团聚体分布、土壤容重、总孔隙度、全氮和有机氮组分,对比分析轮作和间作条件下土壤上述指标的差异,明确施氮和种植模式对土壤结构及有机氮组分和氮储量的影响。
    结果 施氮显著降低玉米种植土壤水稳性大团聚体(> 2 mm)占比,提升微团聚体(< 0.25 mm)比例,并导致团聚体稳定性(平均重量直径、几何平均直径)下降;施氮显著增加大豆种植土壤容重并显著降低总孔隙度,且相比轮作,间作的影响更为显著,同时间作相比轮作也会增加土壤容重。间作显著提升玉米种植土壤全氮含量和氮储量,提升幅度分别为10.56%和10.53%,显著增加酸解全氮和氨基酸态氮含量,增幅分别为19.13%和21.71%,相比于轮作更有利于土壤氮库增加,而施氮对土壤氮库无显著增效;轮作施氮显著提高大豆种植土壤全氮含量和氮储量,实现对大豆种植土壤氮库的协同提升。
    结论 间作与轮作在调控氮库上具有互补优势,间作适用于玉米种植土壤氮素活化,轮作施氮则更利于大豆的土壤氮库可持续提升,研究结果可为西北灌漠土区作物-土壤协同管理提供策略依据。

     

    Abstract:
    Objective The aims were to clarify the differences in soil structure and soil organic nitrogen (N) components under N application and different cropping patterns (intercropping and rotation), and to explore the effects of N application and cropping patterns on soil structure and N components, in order to provide a scientific basis for optimizing cropping systems and achieving sustainable agricultural production.
    Methods Based on a long-term field experiment established in 2013 in the irrigated desert soil area of the Hexi Corridor in Gansu, two N application rates (0 and 300 kg hm2) and three cropping patterns (maize/soybean intercropping; maize-soybean rotation; soybean-maize rotation) were set up. By measuring the distribution of soil water-stable aggregates, soil bulk density, total porosity, total N, and organic N components under rotation and intercropping conditions in 2024, the differences in the above soil indicators between rotation and intercropping conditions were compared and analyzed to clarify the effects of N application and cropping patterns on soil structure, N components, and N storage.
    Result N application significantly reduced the proportion of water-stable macroaggregates (> 2 mm) in the maize zone, increased microaggregates (< 0.25 mm), and decreased aggregate stability (MWD, GMD). It also elevated bulk density and reduced total porosity in the soybean zone, with more pronounced effects under intercropping. Intercropping enhanced maize zone total N by 10.56% and N storage by 10.53%, while increasing acid-hydrolyzable N (19.13%) and amino acid N (21.71%). In contrast, N application in rotation significantly improved soybean zone total N and N storage.
    Conclusion Intercropping increased soil bulk density compared to rotation. N application show no significant effect on maize zone N pools, whereas intercropping promoted soil N accumulation relative to rotation. However, rotational N application synergistically enhances soybean zone N storage. Overall, intercropping and rotation exhibite complementary advantages in N pool regulation: intercropping facilitated N activation in maize zones, while rotational N application sustainably improved soybean zone N storage. These findings provide differentiated strategies for crop-soil synergy-driven strategies in Northwest China’s irrigated desert soils.

     

/

返回文章
返回
Baidu
map